Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Barleta v. Schein et al
as 1:2023cv23422
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cole Barleta
Defendant:
Bettina Schein, Law Offices of Bettina Schein and Bettina Schein doing business as Law Offices of Bettina Schein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Joseph Barleta
as 23-11927
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH COLE BARLETA
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Interested Party:
RYAN K. STUMPHAUZER
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Joseph Barleta
as 23-11914
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH COLE BARLETA
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Interested Party:
RYAN K. STUMPHAUZER
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Joseph Barleta
as 22-13811
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH COLE BARLETA
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE and RYAN K. STUMPHAUZER
Joseph Cole Barleta v. Ryan Stumphauzer
as 22-11694
Interested Party:
RYAN K. STUMPHAUZER
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH COLE BARLETA
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. COMPLETE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS GROUP INC et al
as 1:2020cv00176
Defendant:
ABETTERFINANCIALPLAN.COM LLC d/b/a/ A BETTER FINANCIAL PLAN, ABFP MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC f/k/a/ PILLAR LIFE SETTLEMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC, UNITED FIDELIS GROUP CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv81205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
