Cases 1 - 10 of 82
TERRELL v. WHATLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL, JR
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TABATHA WHATLEY, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD, TARMARSHE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02906
Plaintiff:
JAMES TERRELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Frederick v. James Krause, et al
as 22-13247
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES TERRELL FREDERICK
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES KRAUSE, CORANDO GARCIA, ANDRE RHODES and others
WATERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53923
Plaintiff:
JAMES TERRELL WATERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORD et al v. INCH et al
as 3:2021cv00932
Plaintiff:
JAMES TERRELL FORD and BOBBY GENE GRAHAM
Defendant:
MARK INCH, JIMMY COKER, SGT. STEPHENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD et al v. INCH et al
as 3:2021cv00931
Plaintiff:
JAMES TERRELL FORD and BOBBY GENE GRAHAM
Defendant:
MARK INCH, JIMMY COKER, SGT. STEPHENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHASTANG v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2019cv03866
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JAMES TERRELL CHASTANG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TERRELL v. SMITH
as 1:2019cv00037
Respondent:
WARDEN TARMARSHE SMITH
Petitioner:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TERRELL v. CALHOUN STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2018cv00332
Respondent:
CALHOUN STATE PRISON, COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Petitioner:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Terrell v. Calhoun State Prison et al
as 3:2018cv00063
Respondent:
William Danforth, Calhoun State Prison, State of Georgia and others
Undetermined:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Willie James Terrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
