Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Sylestine et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Ralph Jason Sylestine, Thomas Stock, Rodney Stockman and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Simpson v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01720
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Simpson, Tracy Alan Read, Lakeshia Reaggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Starling v. Siegmeister et al
as 3:2023cv01150
Plaintiff:
Curtis Starling
Defendant:
Jeffrey Alan Siegmeister, Tisheena Holland Rickerson and Heidi Prescott Kemph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWERS v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02296
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALAN POWERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Jeffrey Bourassa
as 23-10027
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JEFFREY ALAN BOURASSA
LAWRENCE v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALAN LAWRENCE
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
ODELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23953
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALAN ODELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOSFELD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21016
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALAN HOSFELD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SANGILLO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20882
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALAN SANGILLO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BREEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19923
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALAN BREEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
