Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Donald Trump, et al v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 23-10387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Interested Party:
ALINA HABBA, HABBA MADAIO & ASSOCIATES and JOHN J. MCCARTHY
Defendant / Appellee:
HILLARY R. CLINTON, HFACC, INC., JOHN PODESTA and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
John McCarthy v. Hillary R. Clinton, et al
as 23-10536
Interested Party:
JOHN J. MCCARTHY
Defendant / Appellee:
HILLARY R. CLINTON, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, HFACC, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
John McCarthy v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 23-10472
Interested Party:
JOHN J. MCCARTHY
Defendant / Appellee:
HILLARY R. CLINTON, DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, HFACC, INC. and others
In re: John McCarthy
as 22-13791
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Interested Party:
JOHN J. MCCARTHY
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
John McCarthy v. Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 22-13695
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN J. MCCARTHY
Respondent / Appellee:
DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
John McCarthy v. Governor of Florida, et al
as 22-13790
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN J. MCCARTHY
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and JOHN DOE AGENTS
McCarthy v. Florey et al
as 8:2022cv02525
Petitioner:
John J. McCarthy
Respondent:
Valery Florey and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarthy v. Governor of Florida et al
as 1:2022cv23193
Plaintiff:
John J. McCarthy
Defendant:
Governor of Florida and John Doe Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
McCarthy v. Florey et al
as 1:2022cv23490
Plaintiff:
John J. McCarthy
Defendant:
Valery Florey and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarthy v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv23310
Plaintiff:
John J. McCarthy
Defendant:
Warden John Doe, Agents John Doe and New Haven Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
