Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Hayes, Cordney v. Dixxon et al
as 4:2024cv10033
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Yvonne Dixxon, Yasmin Oaks, Luis Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordney Hayes v. Edwin Sabillon, et al
as 24-10905
Plaintiff:
CORDNEY MALLORY HAYES
Defendant:
EDWIN SABILLON, Sergeant, Monroe County Detention Center and SAMUEL CARPENTAR, Deputy, Monroe County Detention Center
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Linares
as 4:2024cv10027
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Joseph Linares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Sabillon et al
as 4:2024cv10024
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Edwin Sabillon and Samuel Carpentar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Sabillon et al
as 4:2024cv10019
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Edwin Sabillon and Samuel Carpentar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Carpentar et al
as 4:2024cv10014
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
S. Carpentar and J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes, Cordney v. Linares
as 4:2024cv10012
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Joseph Linares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Oaks et al
as 4:2023cv10119
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Yasmin Oaks, Luis Ibarra, Talika Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Beau Mallory
as 23-13726
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BEAU CHRISTOPHER MALLORY
MALLORY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32332
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MALLORY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
