Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Holloway v. Deputy Pritchett et al
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Arnderico Holloway
Defendant:
Deputy Pritchett, Deputy Will, Patrick Labot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Footman v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv01317
Plaintiff:
Justin Footman
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Chief Jailer, Sheriff Patrick Labat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colbert v. Naph Care Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01315
Plaintiff:
Seneca Colbert
Defendant:
Naph Care Inc. and Latoya Ajileye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobson v. NaphCare Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03632
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
Naph Care Inc., Medical Director at Fulton County Jail, John Does (I-III) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alverio Gonzalez v. Piedmont Medical Hospital Covington, GA et al
as 1:2021cv03000
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Alverio Gonzalez
Defendant:
Piedmont Medical Hospital Covington, GA, NAPH Care Medical, Newton County Jail, Newton County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. Harding et al
as 1:2021cv02620
Defendant:
Ms. Williams, NAPH Care Medical and Ms. Harding
Plaintiff:
George Henry Roe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivory v. Naph Care Dental Service et al
as 1:2021cv01593
Plaintiff:
Estercardo Paire Ivory, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Satin, Naph Care Dental Service and Karen Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Pitts et al
as 1:2020cv01627
Defendant:
Christopher Brasher, Paul Howard, Theodore Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Naph Care
as 1:2020cv00735
Defendant:
Naph Care
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Alan Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browning v. NAPH Care Medical
as 1:2019cv05031
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Browning, Jr.
Defendant:
NAPH Care Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
