Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Rohan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 8:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rohan
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ball v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00932
Plaintiff:
Rohan Ball
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
BALL v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
ROHAN BALL
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Speculative Product Design, LLC v. Patel et al
as 1:2023cv04716
Plaintiff:
Speculative Product Design, LLC
Defendant:
Rohan Vishnubhai Patel and RVP1986 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Bock Holdings, LLC, et al v. Republic of Honduras, et al
as 23-13552
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOCK HOLDINGS, LLC, CINDY MILLER, GARY MILLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
REPUBLIC OF HONDURAS and NATIONAL AGRARIAN INSTITUTE OF HONDURAS
Rohan Mangroo v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-13811
Petitioner:
ROHAN MANGROO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
FINDLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13411
Plaintiff:
ROHAN ANTHONEY FINDLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andrew Delaney v. Upsolve, Inc., et al
as 23-12829
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW JOHN DELANEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UPSOLVE, INC. and ROHAN PAVULURI
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Andrew Delaney v. Upsolve, Inc., et al
as 23-12422
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW JOHN DELANEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UPSOLVE, INC., ROHAN PAVULURI, PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
