Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
IN RE: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
as 1:2009md02084
Plaintiff: George Steven Legrand, Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc., Maxi Drug, Inc. doing business as Brooks Pharmacy and others
Counter Defendant: Meijer Inc and Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
In Re: Androgel Antitrust Litigation (No. II)
Defendant: Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc, Perrigo Company, Par Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Respondent: King Drug Company of Florence, Inc., Miami-Luken, Inc., Prescription Supply, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant: Paddock Laboratories Inc
Petitioner: AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp., Besins Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Meijer Inc et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00958
Counter Defendant: Meijer Inc
Respondent: Dik Drug Company, J.M. Smith Corp. d/b/a Smith Drug Company, Miami-Luken, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp. and others
Defendant: Par Pharmaceuticals Inc, Paddock Laboratories Inc, Solvay Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Plaintiff: Meijer Distribution Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00956
Petitioner: Besins Healthcare, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp. and others
Defendant: Actavis, Inc., Par Pharmaceuticals Inc, Paddock Laboratories Inc and others
Respondent: Burlington Drug co., Miami-Luken, Inc., Value Drug Company and others
Counter Defendant: Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Griffin v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv22509
Plaintiff: Cheryl Griffin
Defendant: AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIANT EAGLE, INC. v. SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv01914
Plaintiff: Giant Eagle, Inc.
Defendant: Solvay Pharmaceuticals Inc, Abbott Products, Inc., AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Rochester Drug Co-Operative In, et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al
as 13-13142
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE INC, MEIJER, INC., MEIJER DISTRIBUTION INC., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNIMED PHARMACEUTICALS INC., SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Ins, et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al
as 12-15587
Plaintiff - Appellant: FORT LAUDERDALE LODGE 31, INSURANCE TRUST FUND, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNIMED PHARMACEUTICALS INC., SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Rochester Drug Co-Operative In, et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al
as 12-15589
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE INC, LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO INC, MEIJER, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNIMED PHARMACEUTICALS INC., SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Health Net, Inc., et al v. Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 12-15585
Plaintiff - Appellant: HEALTH NET, INC., UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE and others
Defendant - Appellee: SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and UNIMED PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Rite Aid Corporation, et al v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al
as 12-15582
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNIONS AND EMPLOYERS MIDWEST HEALTH BENEFITS FUND and FORT LAUDERDALE LODGE 31, INSURANCE TRUST FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: UNIMED PHARMACEUTICALS INC., SOLVAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?