Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Durr v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durr v. County of Osceola et al
as 6:2014cv00091
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
County of Osceola and A. Sobiech
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durr v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv01890
Petitioner:
Stephen Durr
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Durr v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 6:2013cv01363
Petitioner:
Stephen Durr
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DURR v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2013cv00493
Petitioner:
STEPHEN DURR
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Stephen Durr
as 13-12031
Petitioner:
In re: STEPHEN DURR
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Durr v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00566
Petitioner:
Stephen Durr
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Durr v. County of Osceola et al
as 6:2013cv00256
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
County of Osceola and Corporation Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durr v. Osceola County et al
as 6:2013cv00151
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
Osceola County and Corporation Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durr v. Osceola County et al
as 6:2012cv00543
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Defendant:
Osceola County and Corporation Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
