Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hanlon v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James J. Hanlon
Defendant:
Northrop Grumman Corporation, RTX Corporation, Rockwell Collins, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
SAFRAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20577
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS WILLIAM SAFRAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones et al v. Safrin et al
as 8:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Pauline Jones, Gary M. Townsend, Cristal G. Ainsley and others
Defendant:
Mark Safrin, Reality Capital Finance, Heshy Safrin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv80369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Conway v. Safran Oil Systems, LLC
as 2:2021cv00797
Plaintiff:
Keith Conway
Defendant:
Safran Oil Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Safran Landing Systems v. Aviation Tech Support Corp. et al
as 0:2020cv61876
Defendant:
Gilbert Mounie, Aviation Tech Support Corp. and Mathieu Mounie
Plaintiff:
Safran Landing Systems
Safran Landing Systems v. Aviation Tech Support Corp. et al
as 0:2020cv61847
Defendant:
Gilbert Mounie, Aviation Tech Support Corp. and Mathieu Mounie
Plaintiff:
Safran Landing Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Safran Landing Systems v. Aviation Tech Support Corp. et al
as 0:2020cv61846
Defendant:
Gilbert Mounie, Aviation Tech Support Corp. and Mathieu Mounie
Plaintiff:
Safran Landing Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myers et al v. Genuine Parts Company et al
as 1:2014cv00368
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA, 3M Company, Dexter Hysol Aerospace, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Myers and Sherry Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
