Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wright v. Boeckman et al
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Blair Lanston Wright
Defendant:
Laura Boeckman, Fulvio Joseph Gentili, Robert R. Julian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. MOODY et al
as 4:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
BLAIR LANSTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
ASHLEY BROOKE MOODY, FULVIO JOSEPH GENTILI, ROBERT R JULIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Mark B. Gilbert DMD, P.A. et al
as 9:2017cv80129
Plaintiff:
Carmen Bailey
Defendant:
Mark B. Gilbert DMD, P.A. , BMB Dental Management, LLC , Mark B Gilbert and others
Counter_claimant:
Sharon E. Gilbert , BMB Dental Management, LLC , Mark B. Gilbert DMD, P.A. and others
Counter_defendant:
Carmen Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
United States of America v. Angulo et al
as 1:2011cv24422
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sharon E. Angulo and Claudia Zuloaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United States of America v. Angulo
as 1:2011mc20566
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sharon E. Angulo
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
ADKINS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00009
Plaintiff:
SHARON E ADKINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sapp v. Sapp
as 6:2008cv02090
Plaintiff:
Marlon L. Sapp
Defendant:
Sharon E. Sapp
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Angulo v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv23032
Plaintiff:
Sharon E. Angulo
Defendant:
Countrywide Financial Corporation, Countrywide Financial Corporation, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ADKINS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2007cv00209
Plaintiff:
SHARON E ADKINS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
