Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01094
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fagan v. Apt Group LTD et al
as 9:2023cv81499
Plaintiff: Edward D. Fagan
Defendant: Apt Group LTD, Gerard Joseph, Ria Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
NEMBHARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv18399
Plaintiff: SIR NEMBHARD
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ngare v. State of Georgia
as 1:2023cv04465
Plaintiff: Sir Chuku Maurice Oloo Ngare
Defendant: State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02726
Plaintiff: SIR RICH RIVERS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Alex Saab Moran
as 23-10066
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ALEX NAIN SAAB MORAN
Amicus Curiae: SIR IVOR ROBERTS, KCMG, FCIL and others
AVINGTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16479
Plaintiff: SIR TRUSAAN AVINGTON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AVINGTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16484
Plaintiff: SIR TRUSAAN AVINGTON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AVINGTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 1:2022cv00192
Plaintiff: SIR TRUSAAN AVINGTON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ngare v. Owens et al
as 1:2022cv03132
Petitioner: Sir Chuku Maurice Ngare
Respondent: Sheriff Craig Owens, Cobb County Superior Court and DA Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?