Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Tamiko Peele, et al v. 17th Judicial Circuit Court, Broward County, FL, et al
as 23-10916
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMIKO N. PEELE and ROBERT L. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, BROWARD COUNTY, FLA, DOES 1-3, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Peele et al v. The 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Broward County, Florida, et al
as 2:2023cv14037
Plaintiff:
Tamiko N. Peele and Robert L Walker
Defendant:
The 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Broward County, Florida, as Successor in Interest to, it's Court Registry Depository Funds Reserve Notes of $180,030.00 U.S. Currency, it's Records, DOES 1-3 inclusive in their individual and official capacity, The United States of America, through its Social Security Administration Program, it's Cooperative Disability Investigations Program (CDI) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Chery v. Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund et al
as 1:2022cv21008
Plaintiff:
Hazine Chermon Chery
Defendant:
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund, Fidelity Advisor Limited Term Municipal Income Fund, State of Florida Department of Health Vital Statistics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kimberly Tisdale v. Social Security Administratio
as 19-12030
Defendant / Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, COMMISSIONER, United States Social Security Administration an Independent Agency of the United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIMBERLY KAY TISDALE
Parham v. United States Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv00531
Plaintiff:
James Clifford Parham
Defendant:
United States Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Ford v. United States Social Security Administration
as 1:2013cv03109
Plaintiff:
Gregory B. Ford
Defendant:
United States Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
