Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 74
ROBERTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv46189
Plaintiff: THOMAS WALTER ROBERTS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15767
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: THOMAS EVERETT ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBERTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv00697
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: THOMAS SLOAN ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Gilbert Flooring Inc., d/b/a Carpet One Floor & Home We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00150
Defendant: Carpet One Floor & Home and Gilbert Flooring Inc.
Plaintiff: Thomas K Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roberts v. Noe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00682
Respondent: Guy Noe and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Petitioner: Thomas James Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberts v. Noe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00294
Respondent: Guy Noe and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner: Thomas James Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Thomas Roberts
as 18-11792
Petitioner: In re: THOMAS J. ROBERTS
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
In re: Thomas Roberts
as 18-11531
Petitioner: In re: THOMAS J. ROBERTS
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
In re: Thomas Roberts
as 18-11305
Petitioner: In re: THOMAS J. ROBERTS
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
In re: Thomas Roberts
as 18-10659
Petitioner: In re: THOMAS J. ROBERTS
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?