Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Headrick v. Chitwood et al
as 2:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Nathan David Headrick
Defendant:
Sheriff Scott Chitwood and Nurse Teasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headrick v. Chitwood et al
as 4:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Nathan David Headrick
Defendant:
Sheriff Scott Chitwood and Nurse Teasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teasley v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Robbie Teasley
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Teasley et al v. Cobb
as 1:2022cv05030
Plaintiff:
Michelle L. Teasley and Michael Z. Teasley
Defendant:
Donna W. Cobb, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Teasley et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 4:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Barbara Teasley and Patsy McFalls
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
DORSEY v. THOMAS et al
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
JAMES DORSEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF STEVE THOMAS, CAPTAIN TRACY CLAY and OFFICER TEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teasley v. Toby
as 2:2022cv00012
Petitioner:
Christopher Teasley
Respondent:
Annettia Toby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Teasley v. Hamilton Health Care System, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Angela Teasley
Defendant:
Hamilton Health Care System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TEASLEY v. WALMART STORES INC et al
as 3:2020cv00134
Defendant:
WALMART STORES INC, WALMART STORES EAST LP and WALMART INC
Plaintiff:
KRYSTAL TEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teasley v. Sylvan Homes LLC
as 1:2019cv05545
Defendant:
Sylvan Homes LLC
Plaintiff:
Calvin Teasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
