Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Cordova et al v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
as 1:2023cv20087
Defendant:
Miguel Angel Quintero and Maria Christina Quintero, Evian Rodriguez, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cordova and Elvira Suarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Cordova et al v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2022cv24100
Defendant:
Miguel Angel Quintero, Evian Rodriguez, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cordova and Elvira Suarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Strong Current Enterprises Limited v. The Affiliati Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv23692
Plaintiff:
STRONG CURRENT ENTERPRISES LIMITED
Defendant:
PROFIT POINT, INC, The Affiliati Network, Inc., TODD HEBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Homeowners at Bay Pointe, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 6:2019cv00119
Plaintiff:
Homeowners at Bay Pointe, Inc.
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2018cv81036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Potter's House at Cannon Point, Inc. v. City of Lauderhill
as 0:2016cv62031
Plaintiff:
Potter's House at Cannon Point, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Lauderhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
ALEX v. BEAUCHAMP et al
as 3:2016cv00222
Defendant:
BRANDIE BEAUCHAMP , ALANA MOODY , CASWELL FITZPATRICK and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY W ALEX
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2015cv81000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
