Cases 1 - 10 of 45
WPI Collateral Management, LLC et al v. Ramaswamy et al
as 1:2024cv02148
Plaintiff:
WPI Collateral Management, LLC, Banzai Advisory Group, LLC, Banzai Capital Partners, LLC and others
Defendant:
Vivek Ramaswamy, Strive Enterprises, Inc., Strive Asset Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
THIELS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15131
Plaintiff:
SEBASTIAN THIELS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Homer v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv18315
Plaintiff:
Thiel Homer
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multidistrict Litigation
THIEL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20860
Plaintiff:
GEORGE THIEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THIEL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11284
Plaintiff:
SARAH MARIE THIEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THIELE KAOLIN COMPANY v. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT--SOUTHEAST, INC.
as 5:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
THIELE KAOLIN COMPANY
Defendant:
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SOUTHEAST INC doing business as ERM SOUTHEAST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
THIELE KAOLIN COMPANY v. CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY COMPANY
as 5:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
THIELE KAOLIN COMPANY
Defendant:
CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY
George et al v. Dean
as 4:2021cv00195
Plaintiff:
Matthew L George and Mary K Thiele
Defendant:
Beatrice Lynn Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv61088
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv20992
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
