Cases 1 - 10 of 50
COOK v. PHILBEN
as 3:2023cv00078
Petitioner:
DANIEL DELANE COOK
Respondent:
Warden EDWARD PHILBEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COOK v. PHILBEN
as 3:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
DANIEL DELANE COOK
Respondent:
Warden EDWARD PHILBEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Philbin et al
as 1:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
Allen Bailey
Defendant:
Warden Edward Philbin, DWA Vera Harden and Erica Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PHILBIN
as 1:2022cv00120
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Massey v. Augusta State Medical Prison et al
as 1:2022cv02496
Plaintiff:
Dwight David Massey
Defendant:
Augusta State Medical Prison, Warden Edward Philbin, Doctor Mary Alston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PHILBIN
as 1:2022cv00064
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wolchuk v. Filbin et al
as 1:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Bradley Zach Wolchuk
Defendant:
Warden Edward Filbin, Officer Screws, Officer Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PHILBIN
as 1:2022cv00057
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. PHILBIN
as 1:2022cv00045
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. PHILIBIN
as 1:2022cv00039
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
Warden EDWARD PHILIBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
