Cases 21 - 30 of 1,040
Abdul Mohammed v. Frank Easterbrook, et al
as 23-5293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdul Azeem Mohammed
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Easterbrook, Hon., Vanita Gupta, Merrick B. Garland and others
Center for Biological Diversity v. FWS, et al
as 23-5285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, in her official capacity as acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and United States Secretary of the Interior
USA v. William Isaacs
as 23-3200
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
William Isaacs
USA v. William Isaacs
as 23-3204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
William Isaacs
True the Vote, Inc. v. IRS, et al
as 23-5238
Plaintiff / Appellee:
True the Vote, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Internal Revenue Service, United States of America, Steven T. Miller, In his official and Indivicual capacity as former Deputy Commissioner, Services & Enforcement, and Acting Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service and others
Interested Party:
Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc., Bopp Law Firm, PC and Foley and Lardner, LLP
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al v. FWS, et al
as 23-5227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Center for Biological Diversity and Friends of Minnesota Scientific and Natural Areas
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and United States Department of the Interior
USA v. William Calhoun, Jr.
as 23-3150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
William McCall Calhoun, Jr.
USA v. William Goodman
as 23-3147
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
William Goodman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
