Cases 41 - 44 of 44
Initiative Ref Inst, et al v. USPS
as 04-5045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Initiative and Referendum Institute, Citizens for Limited Taxation, The Humane Society of the United States and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Postal Service
Spirit Sage Cncl, et al v. Norton, Gale, et al
as 03-5345
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Spirit of the Sage Council, Biodiversity Legal Foundation, National Endangered Species Network and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Gale A. Norton, Secretary, US Department of the Interior, Jamie Clark, Director, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Roland Schmitten, Assistant Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Donald L. Evans, Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellant:
Coalition for Habitat Conservation, National Association of Home Builders, County of Kern and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Western Urban Water Coalition, American Forest and Paper Association Inc., City of San Diego and others
Fund Animals, et al v. Hogan, Matthew J., et al
as 03-5077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
The Fund For Animals, Inc., Biodiversity Legal Foundation, Utah Environmental Congress and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Steven A. Williams, Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Defendant - Appellee:
Gale A. Norton, Secretary, Department of the Interior and Matthew J. Hogan, Acting Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Humane Scty US, et al v. Glickman, Dan, et al
as 99-5309
Plaintiff - Appellee:
The Humane Society of the United States, Animal Protection Institute of America, Citizens for the Preservation of Wildlife and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Dan Glickman, Secretary U.S. Department of Agriculture, Craig A. Reed, Administrator, Animal, Plant, Health Inspection Service, Martin Lowney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
