Cases 61 - 70 of 1,971
Eugene Kim v. FINRA
as 23-7136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene H. Kim
Defendant / Appellee:
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
Intervenor / Appellee:
United States of America
Martin Akerman v. USA
as 23-5229
Petitioner / Appellant:
Martin Akerman
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transport. v. STB, et al
as 23-1274
Petitioner:
Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority, d/b/a Metra
Respondent:
Surface Transportation Board and United States of America
Anthony Braxton v. USA
as 23-5221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Western Coal Traffic League v. STB, et al
as 23-1272
Petitioner:
Western Coal Traffic League
Respondent:
Surface Transportation Board and United States of America
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 23-5213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and others
William Church, et al v. USA, et al
as 23-5192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William L. A. Church
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ku Klux Klan, (KKK), Ku Klux Klan GEK, Gek Church and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation, J. Edgar Hoover, Dir. FBI, (1966-1972) and others
John Demos, Jr., et al v. USA, et al
as 23-5187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Society of T.R.U.T.H
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Washington, D.C., Donald J. Trump, President and others
Indian Peak Properties LLC v. FCC, et al
as 23-1223
Petitioner:
Indian Peak Properties LLC
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
David Rudometkin v. USA
as 23-5180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David J. Rudometkin
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
