Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sierra Club, et al v. United States Army Corps, et al
as 14-5205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sierra Club
Plaintiff - Appellee:
National Wildlife Federation
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Thomas P. Bostick, in his official capacity as Commanding General and Chief of Engineers of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Richard A. Pratt, in his official capacity as Commander and District Engineer of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Enbridge Pipelines (FSP) L.L.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NLRB v. Pratt Industries, Inc.
as 12-1297
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Pratt Industries, Inc.
Pratt Industries, Inc. v. NLRB
as 12-1259
Petitioner:
Pratt Industries, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Foulger-pratt Residential Con, et al v. Madrigal Condominiums, LLC
as 11-7052
Petitioner - Appellee:
Foulger-Pratt Residential Contracting, LLC and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Respondent - Appellant:
Madrigal Condominiums, LLC
Amin Al Bakri, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 09-5266
Petitioner - Appellee:
Amin Al Bakri, Detainee, United States Air Base at Bagram, Afghanistan and Muhammad Al Bakri, as the Next Friend of Amin Al Bakri
Respondent - Appellant:
Barack Obama, as President of the United States, Robert M. Gates, as Secretary, United States Department of Defense, John Doe 1, Custodian of Petitioner and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Abraham German, Lindsey Graham, Wade Ishimoto and others
Interested Party - Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Baher Azmy, Richard A Epstein, People for the American Way Foundation and others
Fadi Maqaleh, et al v. Robert Gates, et al
as 09-5265
Petitioner - Appellee:
Fadi Al Maqaleh, Detainee and Ahmad Al Maqaleh, as Next Friend of Fadi Al Maqaleh
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert M. Gates, Secretary, United States Department of Defense
Respondent - Appellant:
John Doe, Custodian of Petitioner and John Doe 2, Custodian of Petitioner, Respondents sued in their official capacity
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Abraham German, Lindsey Graham, Wade Ishimoto and others
Interested Party - Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Baher Azmy, Richard A Epstein, People for the American Way Foundation and others
Redha Al-Najar, et al v. Robert Gates, et al
as 09-5267
Petitioner - Appellee:
Redha Al-Najar, Detainee and Houcine Al-Najar, As Next Friend of Redha al-Najar
Respondent - Appellant:
Robert M. Gates, As Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Barack Obama, As President of the United States, John Doe 1, Custodian of Petitoner and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Abraham German, Lindsey Graham, Wade Ishimoto and others
Interested Party - Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
U.S. Army Ranger Association, Baher Azmy, Richard A Epstein and others
Redha Al-Najar, et al v. Robert Gates, et al
as 09-5267
Petitioner:
Redha Al-Najar, Detainee and Houcine Al-Najar, As Next Friend of Redha al-Najar
Respondent:
Robert M. Gates, As Secretary, United States Department of Defense, Barack Obama, As President of the United States, John Doe 1, Custodian of Petitoner and others
Amicus Curiae:
Abraham German, Lindsey Graham, Wade Ishimoto and others
Not Yet Classified:
U.S. Army Ranger Association, Baher Azmy, Richard A Epstein and others
Fadi Maqaleh, et al v. Robert Gates, et al
as 09-5265
Petitioner:
Fadi Al Maqaleh, Detainee and Ahmad Al Maqaleh, as Next Friend of Fadi Al Maqaleh
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert M. Gates, Secretary, United States Department of Defense
Respondent:
John Doe, Custodian of Petitioner and John Doe 2, Custodian of Petitioner, Respondents sued in their official capacity
Amicus Curiae:
Abraham German, Lindsey Graham, Wade Ishimoto and others
Not Yet Classified:
Baher Azmy, Richard A Epstein, People for the American Way Foundation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
