Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Darrell Wilcox, et al v. Georgetown University, et al
as 23-7059
Plaintiff / Appellant: Darrell Wilcox and Michael McGuire, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries in and on behalf of the Georgetown University Defined Contribution Retirement Plan, the Georgetown University Voluntary Contribution Retirement Plan
Defendant / Appellee: Georgetown University, Christopher Augostini and Geoff Chatas
Leatrice Tanner-Brown, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-5302
Plaintiff / Appellant: Leatrice Tanner-Brown, personal Representative of the Estate of George W. Curls, Sr., and of the Class of Similarly Situated Individuals and Harvest Institute Freedmen Federation, LLC, on behalf of itself and all persons similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: Debra A. Haaland, Secretary of the Interior and Tara Maclean Sweeney, Assistant Secretary Indian Affairs
Issouf Coubaly, et al v. Cargill Incorporated, et al
as 22-7104
Plaintiff / Appellant: Issouf Coubaly, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members, Sidiki Bamba, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members, Tenimba Djamoutene, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members and others
Defendant / Appellee: Cargill Incorporated, Nestle USA Inc., Cargill Cocoa and others
Elsa Maldonado, et al v. DC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-7060
Plaintiff / Appellant: Elsa Maldonado, Ann Robertson, behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals and BR, by her parent and next friend: Ann Robertson
Defendant / Appellee: District of Columbia, a municipal corporation
John Doe 1, et al v. Apple Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-7135
Plaintiff / Appellant: John Doe 1, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members, John Doe 2, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members, Jane Doe 1, Individually and on behalf of Proposed Class Members and others
Defendant / Appellee: Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Microsoft Corp. and others
Estate of Earnest Lee Boyland, et al v. AGRI, et al
as 21-5237
Plaintiff / Appellant: Estate of Earnest Lee Boyland, Estate of David Shelton, Estate of Lee Sylvester Caldwell and others
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Agriculture, EPIQ Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc., United States Department of Agriculture Hispanic & Women Farmers and Ranchers Claims Administrator and others
Weih Chang, et al v. Unnamed OVW Grantees And VAWA, et al
as 21-5145
Plaintiff / Appellant: Gordon Gene Smith, Individually and as Taxpayers, and on behalf of a Class of others similarly situated and Weih Steve Chang
Defendant / Appellee: Laura L. Rogers, Office on Violence Against Women and Unnamed OVW Grantees and VAWA Coodinators, Private and Governmental, in their individual and official capacities, jointly and severally
Secretary of Labor v. M-Class Mining, LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1369
Respondent: M-Class Mining, LLC and Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Petitioner: Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Annapolis Citizens Class Over, et al v. Stantec, Inc., et al
as 20-7052
Petitioner / Appellant: Loudon Operations LLC and Annapolis Citizens Class Overcharged For Water-Sewer
Respondent / Appellee: Stantec, Inc., also known as Stantec Architecture, Inc., also known as Stantec Consulting Ltd., also known as Stantec Engineering Consultant and GHD, Inc., Annapolis Water/Sewer Consultant, also known as GHD Pty Ltd, also known as GHD Properties LLC, also known as DVO, Inc.
Willie Kennedy, et al v. Sonny Perdue, et al
as 20-5107
Defendant / Appellee: Charles Herd, High Plains Farm Credit - Kansas, State of Louisiana and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Corey Lea, The Cowtown Foundation Inc. and Willie Charles Kennedy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?