Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Inez Qtaish v. Metro Lab
as 23-7170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Inez Qtaish
Defendant / Appellee:
Metro Lab
Paragould Light & Water Commission, et al v. FERC
as 23-1133
Petitioner:
Paragould Light & Water Commission, d/b/a Paragould Light, Water & Cable - PLWC, City of Poplar Bluff Municipal Utilities, Kennett Board of Public Works and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Evergy Kansas Central, Inc., et al v. FERC
as 22-1221
Petitioner:
Evergy Kansas Central, Inc., Evergy Metro, Inc. and Evergy Missouri West, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Labadie Environmental Org, et al v. EPA, et al
as 20-1467
Petitioner:
Metro East Green Alliance, Labadie Environmental Organization, Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Unsuck DC Metro v. WMATA, et al
as 20-7051
Defendant / Appellee:
Paul J. Wiedefeld, in his Official Capacity as General Manager of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Unsuck DC Metro
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-1225
Petitioner:
Wilmington, Delaware, Chevy Chase Village, Maryland, Minneapolis, MN and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Northeast Georgia Medical Center, 14cv503 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Siloam Springs Arkansas Hospital Company, Llc, 14cv1477, doing business as Siloam Springs Arkansas Hospital Company, Llc, Lafayette General Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
State of New York, et al v. DOL, et al
as 19-5125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
District of Columbia, State of Maryland, State of Washington and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, United States Department of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
Amicus Curiae:
Lake Cities Chamber of Commerce, (Texas), State of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matt Bevin, Las Vegas Latin Chamber of Commerce, (Nevada) and others
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5082
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lubbock County Hospital District, 14cv503, doing business as University Medical Center, Board Of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital, 14cv503, doing business as North Kansas City Hospital, Community Hospital of Brazosport, 14cv503, doing business as Brazosport Regional Health System and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5087
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Memorial Hospital Flagler, Inc., 15cv192 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Longmont United Hospital, 15-cv-01800, Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
