Cases 111 - 120 of 167
STONE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2014cv00625
Plaintiff:
JACOB STONE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ALANIZ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2013cv01812
Plaintiff:
MARTIN SANCHEZ-ALANIZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JEAN-PIERRE
as 1:2013cv01586
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JEAN-PIERRE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Prison Legal News v. Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
as 13-5269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Prison Legal News
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Andre Leffebre v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 13-5236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andre David Leffebre
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, David Berkebile, Warden, Administrative Maximum, A. Clemmer, AdMax Psychology Director and others
FLRA v. Department of Justice
as 13-1067
Petitioner:
Federal Labor Relations Authority
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Federal Correctional Complex Coleman, Florida
Carl Swope v. Department of Justice, et al
as 13-5045
Appellant:
Carl T. Swope
Appellee:
United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Vincent Marino v. CIA, et al
as 12-5325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vincent Michael Marino
Defendant - Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency and others
United States Department of Ju v. FLRA
as 12-1383
Petitioner:
United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Federal Correctional Complex Coleman, Florida
Respondent:
Federal Labor Relations Authority
Percy Jeter, Jr. v. BOP, et al
as 12-5285
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Percy L. Jeter, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Parole Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
