Cases 1 - 10 of 10,407
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2024cv01916
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
PRESCOTT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01886
Plaintiff:
DERIC W PRESCOTT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rainbow Energy Center, LLC v. EPA, et al
as 24-1226
Petitioner:
Rainbow Energy Center, LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
ENGLEHARDT et al v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv01865
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL ENGLEHARDT and YVONNE DORA WADE
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Midwest Ozone Group v. EPA, et al
as 24-1223
Petitioner:
Midwest Ozone Group
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 24-1225
Petitioner:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Sprint Corporation v. FCC, et al
as 24-1224
Petitioner:
Sprint Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml01350
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01856
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Daniel Kingery
as 24-3088
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel Melzine Kingery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
