Cases 171 - 180 of 8,380
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02367
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DESIR v. NEW YORK STATE D.O.C.C.S
as 1:2023cv02366
Plaintiff:
STIVENSON DESIR
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE D.O.C.C.S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv02311
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL K. HILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON BOUNDARIES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JACK v. JACK et al
as 1:2023cv02303
Petitioner:
JOHN JACK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF WASHINGTON, OFFICE OF THE BISHIP - DIOCESE OF TEXARKANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MORGAN v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv02223
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02224
Petitioner:
RONNIE LEON BRYANT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anthony Braxton v. Superior Court of the District of Columbia
as 23-7102
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony Braxton
Respondent / Appellee:
Superior Court of the District of Columbia
NERIO v. INTERNAL HOUSE-TEXAS
as 1:2023cv02179
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD ANTHONY NERIO
Defendant:
INTERNAL HOUSE-TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEYS v. CONNORS et al
as 1:2023cv02183
Plaintiff:
CLAY KEYS
Defendant:
IAN CONNORS, JOHN DOES 1-2, HERIBERTO TELLEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
