Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Robert Andrew-Bey v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5069
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew-Bey
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland and Muriel Bowser
REED v. CUSHWA et al
as 1:2023cv03117
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Respondent:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, CHRISTOPHER WHITMER and COLLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andrew Cox v. Merrick Garland
as 23-5108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andrew Cox
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, United States Attorney General
HUNTER v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE et al
as 1:2022cv03866
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HUNTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OFFICE, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and JAMES ANDREW LOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 1:2022cv03395
Plaintiff:
JARREL JOHNSON
Defendant:
TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. STATE OF MARYLAND et al
as 1:2022cv01830
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SCOTT TAYLOR
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, LEONARD VANDERLINDE, JULIE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GASTONG v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2022cv01635
Plaintiff:
HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV
Defendant:
MONIQUE M SCOTT, ANDREW H WARREN, JULIEANNE M HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. WHITMER et al
as 1:2022cv01653
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDREW REED and ROBERT ANDREW BEY
Respondent:
CHRIS WHITMER, UNITED STATES PAROLE BOARD AGENCY, UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Michael Moore v. Justin Andrews
as 22-5111
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Moore, a/k/a Steven Robinson
Respondent / Appellee:
Justin Andrews, Warden, FCI-Petersburg
REED v. TISCHNER et al
as 1:2022cv00855
Not Classified By Court:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
RICHARD S. TISCHNER and JENNIFER DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
