Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Jose Apollo, Sr. v. MPD, District Of Columbia, et al
as 22-5340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Apollo, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
MPD, District Of Columbia, Andre Williams, Marina Bronstein and others
COTTLE v. U.S. CONGRESS et al
as 1:2021cv02352
Plaintiff:
BRYAN K. COTTLE, SR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, U. S. CONGRESS, U.S. DOJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
O'CONNOR v. S.O.M.E. et al
as 1:2020cv02298
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMS, CHARLES ALLEN, VINCENT C. GRAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN E. O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAIRSTON SR. v. MSPB et al
as 1:2020cv00725
Plaintiff:
HAIRSTON SR. and ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON SR.
Defendant:
MSPB, SUPREME COURT, PETER MARKSTEINER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE et al v. PEARSON et al
as 1:2020cv00614
Defendant:
MICHAEL PEARSON, JOHN DOE, 3, ANTHONY GATON and others
Plaintiff:
DENISE PRICE and JEFFREY PRICE, SR.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TYSON SR. v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al
as 1:2020cv00147
Plaintiff:
HOWARD TRENTON TYSON SR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, COAST PROFESSIONAL INC/COLLECTION and TIMOTHY GRIBBEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIVIZ et al v. ROBERTS
as 1:2019cv02759
Plaintiff:
ILYA LIVIZ, Sr. and ILYA LIVIZ, Jr.
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CALDWELL v. SHULKIN et al
as 1:2018cv00353
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROBERT CALDWELL, SR.
Defendant:
DAVID J. SHULKIN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, SUZANNE M. KLINKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
SCHULTZ v. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2018cv00184
Plaintiff:
KIRK SCHULTZ
Defendant:
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, TIMOTHY D. CONWAY, JR., SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. PARKER et al
as 1:2017cv02706
Plaintiff:
KEVIN L. TUCKER
Defendant:
CARL D. PARKER, AEAONMS, INC., CHARLES DAVENPORT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
