Cases 21 - 30 of 4,959
FREDERICK v. BUC-EES
as 1:2024cv01465
Plaintiff:
DARION DION FREDERICK
Defendant:
BUC-EES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
FREDERICK v. COMPUTER PROGRAMMER
as 1:2024cv01463
Plaintiff:
DARION DION FREDERICK
Defendant:
COMPUTER PROGRAMMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MAJORS v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
DARRYL MAJORS
Defendant:
DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
STRIPLIN v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2024cv01435
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Not Yet Classified:
DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. Senate Impeachment Comm. and B.W.T., a minor child
DALBIS v. PUBIC EMPLOYEES OF SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE SERVICES OF FRANCE AND EUROPE
as 1:2024cv01434
Plaintiff:
LOUIS-ALEXANDRE NOEL ALBERT DALBIS
Defendant:
PUBIC EMPLOYEES OF SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE SERVICES OF FRANCE AND EUROPE, NATIONAL GENDARMERIE and LAURANT MAUVE-CECILE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
STRIPLIN v. WRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, KAMALA D. HARRIS, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
CHAMBERS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
CARISSA CHAMBERS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WILLIAMSON v. ANALYTICS CONSULTING LLC. et al
as 1:2024cv01403
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EUGENE WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
ANALYTICS CONSULTING LLC., OFFICE OF CONSUMER PROTECTION, D.C. OFFICE OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHARMA v. SINGH
as 1:2024cv01541
Plaintiff:
MEHUL SHARMA
Defendant:
RAJNATH SINGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HARO v. STARK
as 1:2024cv01294
Plaintiff:
ABIGAIL HARO
Defendant:
ALAN M. STARK
Cross Defendant:
KEVIN B. PIERCY, TAYLOR R. EALAND, JAMES D. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
