Cases 51 - 60 of 1,342
Inez Qtaish v. United States District Court for the District of
as 24-5017
Plaintiff:
Inez Qtaish
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Bankruptcy Clerks Office
LYLE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
EDWARD W. LYLE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
N. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
L. N., Jessica North Macie and Jani North Saale
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
GRIFFIN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
MARK GRIFFIN
Defendant:
PAMELA SMITH, JOHN DOE and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
JERICA HARRELL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03611
Plaintiff:
JERICA HARRELL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
G.L. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
G. L., Gary Le, Vanessa Le and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
QTAISH v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03702
Plaintiff:
INEZ QTAISH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CRAWFORD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD
as 1:2023cv03906
Plaintiff:
MIA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
T.F. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03612
Plaintiff:
TF and T.F.
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Michael Hurd, Jr. v. DC
as 23-7176
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Hurd, Jr.
Defendant:
District of Columbia, Government and District of Columbia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
