Cases 1 - 10 of 24
CAI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
XIULING CAI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. D.C. LAW ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
ELLIS D. THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
D.C. LAW ENFORCEMENT, MAMIE OSOLA THOMAS-SMITH, MONICA LINDSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DURBIN v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2022cv03222
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL DURBIN
Defendant:
NANCY PATRICIA PELOSI, CHARLES ELLIS SCHUMER, ADDISON MITCHELL MCCONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harold Stanley, et al v. James Duff, et al
as 22-5044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Harold R. Stanley, Michael Beals Ellis and Robert A. McNeil
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lee C. Prymmer, Barry E. Brooks, William B. McGarvin and others
Defendant / Appellee:
James C. Duff and Sheryl L. Walter
THOMAS v. DC LAW ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2021cv01383
Plaintiff:
ELLIS D. THOMAS JR.
Defendant:
DC-MPD, MAMIE OSOLA THOMAS-SMITH, DC SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. US GOVERNMENT
as 1:2019cv02260
Plaintiff:
ELLIS D. THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
US GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POLLARD v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2018cv02619
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
ELLIS POLLARD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
STANLEY et al v. DUFF et al
as 1:2018cv01746
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. MCNEIL, LEE C. PRYMMER, WILLIAM B. MCGARVIN and others
Defendant:
JAMES DUFF and SHERYL WALTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BELFER v. CATELLANI
as 1:2018cv00181
Plaintiff:
ELLIS S. BELFER
Defendant:
GREG CATELLANI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BELFER v. MARSHALL et al
as 1:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
ELLIS S. BELFER
Defendant:
ANDREA I. MARSHALL, KIM GUADAGNO and ANGIE BELFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
