Cases 71 - 80 of 137
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv01431
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RUSSEL PERDUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DARDEN v. U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2013cv01380
Petitioner:
WILLIAM A. DARDEN
Respondent:
U. S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
William Brooks v. DOJ
as 13-5274
Petitioner - Appellant:
William R. Brooks
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
BAKER v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2013cv00940
Petitioner:
RALPH OWEN BAKER
Respondent:
MARY JO WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2013cv00514
Petitioner:
THEODORE J. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
EMBREY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00091
Petitioner:
WILLIAM J.R. EMBREY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROOKS v. HOGSTEN
as 1:2012cv01788
Petitioner:
WILLIAM R. BROOKS
Respondent:
KAREN F. HOGSTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01480
Petitioner:
CLARENCE E. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TRUSELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01300
Petitioner:
WILLIAM VAN TRUSELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CATHERINE C. EAGLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01206
Petitioner:
CLARENCE E. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JAMES C. DEVER, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
