Prison Condition Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 121 - 130 of 346
TURNER v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01851
Plaintiff: DONALD TURNER
Defendant: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., MARK KIRBY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VIANEZ v. ADMINISTRATION DIVISION et al
as 1:2014cv01725
Plaintiff: JUAN VIANEZ
Defendant: ADMINISTRATION DIVISION, JUSTIN ANDREWS and BRADLEY T. GROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSTON v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2014cv01727
Plaintiff: ERIC HOUSTON
Defendant: P. JOHNSON, ANDERSON and R. ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL-AMIN v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01561
Plaintiff: SALEEM EL-AMIN
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALLETT v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv01496
Plaintiff: DAWANE A. MALLETT
Defendant: CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., JENNIFER COULTER, PAUL ZOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUBBARD v. CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON-CORCORAN
as 1:2014cv01222
Plaintiff: ZANE HUBBARD
Defendant: CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON-CORCORAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDULLAH v. DREW et al
as 1:2014cv01078
Plaintiff: MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA ABDULLAH
Defendant: DREW, HAWKINS, DUNCAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUFFALO v. COMMISSIONER OF MENTAL HEALTH et al
as 1:2014cv00876
Plaintiff: CLARENCE GARFIELD BUFFALO
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF MENTAL HEALTH, JAMES C. REEVES, MICHAEL R. DOUCETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2014cv00842
Plaintiff: CHARLES EDWARD THOMAS
Defendant: SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JON OZMINT and PRISON DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANSER v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv00867
Plaintiff: DAVID K. DANSER
Defendant: GEORGE E. SAMUELS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RODNEY W. CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?