Cases 161 - 170 of 346
JONES v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI et al
as 1:2013cv00497
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ARDEN JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEAMING v. SIMMONS et al
as 1:2013cv00480
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING
Defendant:
J. SIMMONS, MEYER and ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAPLES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00468
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM STAPLES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., HARRELL WATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GORE v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2013cv00479
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M. GORE
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARCIA v. WHEATON
as 1:2013cv00474
Plaintiff:
JESUS H. GARCIA, JR.
Defendant:
D. WHEATON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEAMING v. SUTER et al
as 1:2013cv00481
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING
Defendant:
K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON and JACK FOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Rice v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 13-5078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Rice, also known as Anthony Wright
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Eleanor Holmes Norton, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
MODENA v. SAMUELS
as 1:2013cv00255
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN MODENA
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2013cv00165
Plaintiff:
HOWARD L. HILL, II
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., HARRELL WATTS, J. L. NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANCHEZ ALANIS v. WOODS
as 1:2013cv00153
Plaintiff:
MARTIN SANCHEZ ALANIS
Defendant:
WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
