Cases 171 - 180 of 346
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00156
Plaintiff:
THEODORE J. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES C. DEVER, III, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. DAVY et al
as 1:2012mc00647
Petitioner:
LARRY M. BANKS
Respondent:
THOMAS DAVY and THOMAS DART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HA v. MILOSNIC et al
as 1:2012cv01897
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. HA
Defendant:
L.J. MILOSNIC, JUAN CASTILLO, CHARLES SAMUELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WISE v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2012cv01880
Plaintiff:
ERIC WISE
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., ERIC WILSON, HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAZQUEZ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2012cv01730
Plaintiff:
PABLO J. FIGUEROA VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE and METROPOLITAN DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WISE v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2012cv01591
Plaintiff:
ERIC WISE
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., ERIC WILSON, HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAGBY v. THALER et al
as 1:2012cv01521
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC WAYNE BAGBY
Defendant:
RICK THALER, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, RUPERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEVENS v. LOCKETT et al
as 1:2012cv01219
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. STEVENS
Defendant:
CHARLES LOCKETT, CRAIG APKER, RHODES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. KANE
as 1:2012cv01212
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. NEAL
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Salter v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 12-5202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Louis Salter, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles A. Samuels and Bureau of Prisons, Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
