Cases 1 - 10 of 12
JENKINS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
ROGER WILLIAMS, PROVIDENCE VA MEDICAL CENTER, RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHEN
as 1:2022cv03562
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM A. CHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
LIPNICK et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03451
Plaintiff:
DALE A LIPNICK, WILLIAM C LIPNICK, WILLIAM C. LIPNICK and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
BUCHOLZ v. MNUCHIN et al
as 1:2019cv01730
Defendant:
CHARLES RETTIG, DARRYL J. JENKINS, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES S. BUCHOLZ
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KNOX, et al
as 1:2017cv01604
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. KNOX and BARBARA H. KNOX
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KNOX et al
as 1:2017cv00740
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. KNOX and BARBARA H. KNOX
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
POWELL v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2017cv00278
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. POWELL
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
RODRIGUEZ et al v. SHULMAN et al
as 1:2011cv01183
Plaintiff:
IRENE D. RODRIGUEZ and ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, WILLIAM J. WILKINS, DEBORAH A. BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
LEITNER v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2009cv02342
Plaintiff:
MARK DANIEL LEITNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, ERIC HOLDER, TIFFANY HOPE EGGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
