Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 75
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court: STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant: NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner: AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent: BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of Alabama, et al v. EPA
as 16-1204
Intervenor: American Public Health Association, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Exelon Corporation and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae: Robert P. Mason, Celia Y. Chen, Noelle Eckley Selin and others
Petitioner: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Railroad Commission of Texas, State of Arizona and others
State of Iowa, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-1144
Petitioner: State of Iowa, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. FACEBOOK, INC.
as 1:2020cv03589
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant: FACEBOOK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
DAKOTA RESOURCE COUNCIL et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01853
Plaintiff: DAKOTA RESOURCE COUNCIL, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, LIVING RIVERS and others
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Not Classified By Court: STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Intervenor Defendant: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation v. DOI, et al
as 22-5185
Plaintiff / Appellee: Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and Robert Anderson, in his official capacity as Solicitor of the United States Department of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: State of North Dakota
STATE OF COLORADO et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03715
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
STATE OF ALABAMA et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 1:2020cv03551
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC agent of d/b/a MR. COOPER and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC doing business as MR. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MANDAN, HIDATSA AND ARIKARA NATION v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2020cv01918
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DANIEL H. JORJANI and DAVID L. BERNHARDT
Plaintiff: MANDAN, HIDATSA AND ARIKARA NATION
Intervenor Defendant: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al v. United States Army Corps We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5197
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: Dakota Access LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee: Oglala Sioux Tribe, 17cv267, Robert Flying Hawk, 16cv1796, Chairman of the Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and others
Not Yet Classified: Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Steve Vance
Defendant / Appellee: United States Army Corps of Engineers
Amicus Curiae: North Dakota Grain Dealers Association, North Dakota Farm Bureau, American Line Pipe Producers Association and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?