Cases 11 - 20 of 80
State of Iowa, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-1144
Petitioner:
State of Iowa, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner:
State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified:
ConservAmerica
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
STATE OF COLORADO et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03715
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. FACEBOOK, INC.
as 1:2020cv03589
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
STATE OF ALABAMA et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 1:2020cv03551
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC agent of d/b/a MR. COOPER and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC doing business as MR. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al v. United States Army Corps
as 20-5201
Amicus Curiae:
State of North Dakota, State of Arkansas, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Robert Flying Hawk, 16cv1796, Chairman of the Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee, Yankton Sioux Tribe, 16cv1796, Oglala Sioux Tribe, 17cv267 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Not Yet Classified:
Steve Vance and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Dakota Access LLC
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al v. United States Army Corps
as 20-5197
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Dakota Access LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oglala Sioux Tribe, 17cv267, Robert Flying Hawk, 16cv1796, Chairman of the Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and others
Not Yet Classified:
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Steve Vance
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Amicus Curiae:
North Dakota Grain Dealers Association, North Dakota Farm Bureau, American Line Pipe Producers Association and others
State of New York, et al v. DOL, et al
as 19-5125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
District of Columbia, State of Maryland, State of Washington and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, United States Department of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
Amicus Curiae:
Lake Cities Chamber of Commerce, (Texas), State of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matt Bevin, Las Vegas Latin Chamber of Commerce, (Nevada) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
