Cases 21 - 30 of 85
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. DEVOS et al
as 1:2020cv01468
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant:
ELISABETH DEVOS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, AASA, SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT'S ASSOCIATION and others
Petitioner:
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER and SPEECH FIRST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION et al v. TMTE, INC. et al
as 1:2020mc00094
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION, ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL and others
Defendant:
TMTE, INC., LUCAS THOMAS ERB, LUKE ASHER and others
Receiver:
KELLY CRAWFORD
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al v. United States Army Corps
as 20-5197
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Dakota Access LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oglala Sioux Tribe, 17cv267, Robert Flying Hawk, 16cv1796, Chairman of the Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and others
Not Yet Classified:
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Steve Vance
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Amicus Curiae:
North Dakota Grain Dealers Association, North Dakota Farm Bureau, American Line Pipe Producers Association and others
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al v. United States Army Corps
as 20-5201
Amicus Curiae:
State of North Dakota, State of Arkansas, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Robert Flying Hawk, 16cv1796, Chairman of the Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee, Yankton Sioux Tribe, 16cv1796, Oglala Sioux Tribe, 17cv267 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers
Not Yet Classified:
Steve Vance and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Dakota Access LLC
USA ex rel Elizabeth Kennedy, et al v. Novo A/S, et al
as 20-7062
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Elizabeth W. Kennedy, et al.
Interested Party:
State of Minnesota, State of Rhode Island, State of Delaware and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo A/S, Novo Nordisk Foundation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elizabeth W. Kennedy
Downwinders at Risk, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1024
Petitioner:
Downwinders at Risk, Sierra Club and National Parks Conservation Association
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew Wheeler, Acting Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Undetermined:
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and State of Texas
State of New York, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1019
Petitioner:
State of Delaware, State of New Jersey, State of Maryland and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Undetermined:
Homer City Generation, L.P., Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Utility Air Regulatory Group and others
AGARWAL et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv03125
Defendant:
MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, JACQUELINE L. RUSSELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANIL AGARWAL, MADHU AGARWAL and RISHI RAKSHPAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
STATE NATIONAL BANK OF BIG SPRING et al v. GEITHNER et al
as 1:2012cv01032
Defendant:
TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, THOMAS M. HOENIG, ELIZABETH DUKE and others
Petitioner:
VICTOR WILLIAMS and SEAN P. DUFFY
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF MONTANA and others
Amicus Curiae:
CONSUMERS' RESEARCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ENGLISH v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv02534
Petitioner:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STENY HOYER, BRAD SHERMAN, ELIZABETH WARREN and others
Defendant:
JOHN MICHAEL MULVANEY, DONALD JOHN TRUMP and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
LEANDRA ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
