Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 188
Ergon Refining, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 20-1474
Petitioner: Ergon Refining, Inc. and Ergon-West Virginia, Inc.
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
American Municipal Power, Inc., et al v. FERC
as 20-1449
Petitioner: American Municipal Power, Inc., Public Utilities Commission of Ohio's Office of the Federal Energy Advocate, PJM Industrial Customer Coalition and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court: STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant: NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner: AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent: BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION et al v. TMTE, INC. et al
as 1:2020mc00094
Plaintiff: STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION, ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL and others
Defendant: TMTE, INC., LUCAS THOMAS ERB, LUKE ASHER and others
Receiver: KELLY CRAWFORD
City of Huntington, WV v. HUD, et al
as 20-5229
Plaintiff / Appellee: City of Huntington, West Virginia
Defendant / Appellant: Benjamin S. Carson, Sr., Secretary, in his Official Capacity and United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
Michael Eisenberg v. West Virginia Office, et al
as 20-7070
Plaintiff / Appellant: Michael D.J. Eisenberg
Defendant / Appellee: West Virginia Office of Disciplinary Counsel, "OLDC", also known as Office of Lawyers Disciplinary Counsel, Jessica H. Donahue Rhodes, Lawyer Disciplinary Counsel, OLDC and Rachael L. Flecher Cipoletti, Chief Disciplinary Counsel, OLDC
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al v. United States Army Corps
as 20-5201
Amicus Curiae: State of North Dakota, State of Arkansas, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Robert Flying Hawk, 16cv1796, Chairman of the Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee, Yankton Sioux Tribe, 16cv1796, Oglala Sioux Tribe, 17cv267 and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States Army Corps of Engineers
Not Yet Classified: Steve Vance and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Dakota Access LLC
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al v. United States Army Corps We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5197
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: Dakota Access LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee: Oglala Sioux Tribe, 17cv267, Robert Flying Hawk, 16cv1796, Chairman of the Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and others
Not Yet Classified: Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Steve Vance
Defendant / Appellee: United States Army Corps of Engineers
Amicus Curiae: North Dakota Grain Dealers Association, North Dakota Farm Bureau, American Line Pipe Producers Association and others
American Hospital Association, et al v. Alex Azar, II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5193
Plaintiff / Appellant: Association of American Medical Colleges, National Association of Children's Hospitals, Bothwell Regional Health Center and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alex M. Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services
Amicus Curiae: The Connecticut Hospital Association, The Texas Hospital Association, The Healthcare Association of Hawaii and others
CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv01114
Defendant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: NSA, GP, CENTURY ALUMINUM OF WEST VIRGINIA, INC., ENTURY ALUMINUM OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?