Cases 41 - 50 of 77
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al v. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2017cv01331
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS , PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA , STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and BETSY DEVOS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
White Stallion Energy Center v. EPA
as 12-1100
Intervenor:
Chase Power Development, LLC, American Public Health Association, State of North Carolina and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Chest Physicians, Richard J. Lazarus, Oliver A. Houck and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
White Stallion Energy Center, LLC
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-1264
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
State of Connecticut, State of California, State of Illinois and others
USA, et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 16-5220
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, formerly known as Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
Lindsay Jenkins
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 16-1220
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Alabama, Arizona Corporation Commission and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00199
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant:
HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC. , HSBC BANK USA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Lignite Energy Council and Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc. and State of Minnesota, By and through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. SYSCO CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv00256
Defendant:
SYSCO CORPORATION, USF HOLDING CORP. and US FOODS, INC.
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Interested Party:
DISTRIBUTION MARKET ADVANTAGE, CHENEY BROTHERS, INC., CULVER FRANCHISING SYSTEM, INC. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
HPSI PURCHASING SERVICES
Petitioner:
XYZ CORPORATION, FOODBUY, LLC and COMPASS GROUP USA, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP, INC.
Intervenor:
REINHART FOODSERVICE, L.L.C. and SHAMROCK FOODS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 53 b Federal Trade Commission Act
Southeastern Legal Foundation, v. EPA
as 10-1131
Petitioner:
John Shimkus, U.S. Representative, Illinois 19th District, John Linder, U.S. Representative, Georgia 7th District, Georgia Agribusiness Council, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Glass Association of North America, State of North Carolina, Utility Air Regulatory Group and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Municipal Gas Commission of Missouri and American Chemistry Council
Consumer Financial Protection, et al v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 14-5265
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, State of Alabama, Alabama Attorney General's Office, State of Alaska, Alaska Attorney General's Office and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation and OCWEN Loan Servicing, LLC
Movant - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
