Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Monte Silver, et al v. USA
as 23-5049
Plaintiff / Appellant: Monte Silver and Monte Silver, Ltd., an Israeli corporation
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America
Monte Silver, et al v. IRS, et al
as 22-5341
Plaintiff / Appellant: Monte Silver and Monte Silver, Ltd.
Defendant / Appellee: Internal Revenue Service, United States Department of the Treasury, Charles Rettig, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service and others
SILVER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00013
Plaintiff: MONTE SILVER and MONTE SILVER, LTD.
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7431 IRS: Unauthorized Inspection or Disclosure of Returns and Return Information
Monte Silver, et al v. IRS, et al
as 21-5116
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Treasury, Attorney General of the United States, Charles Rettig, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Monte Silver and Monte Silver, Ltd., an Israeli corporation
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2020cv01543
Not Classified By Court: CHARLES RETTIG, STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Plaintiff: NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
SILVER et al v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01544
Defendant: CHARLES RETTIG, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and others
Plaintiff: MONTE SILVER LTD., and MONTE SILVER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ROSE, JR. et al v. AZAR, II et al
as 1:2019cv02848
Defendant: Alex Azar, Demetrios Kouzoukas, Seema Verma and others
Plaintiff: Mary Holbrock, Rhonda Cree, Monte A. Rose Jr. and others
Intervenor Defendant: INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5227
Plaintiff / Appellee: Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Northeast Georgia Medical Center, 14cv503 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Siloam Springs Arkansas Hospital Company, Llc, 14cv1477, doing business as Siloam Springs Arkansas Hospital Company, Llc, Lafayette General Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-5082
Plaintiff / Appellee: Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, Palmerton Hospital-Carbon, 16-cv-01543, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Lubbock County Hospital District, 14cv503, doing business as University Medical Center, Board Of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital, 14cv503, doing business as North Kansas City Hospital, Community Hospital of Brazosport, 14cv503, doing business as Brazosport Regional Health System and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Shands Jacksonville Medical, et al v. Alex Azar, II We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-5087
Plaintiff / Appellee: Shands Teaching Hospital and Clinics, Inc., doing business as UFHealth Shands Hospital, San Joaquin Community Hospital, 14cv1477, doing business as Adventist Health/San Joaquin Community Hospital, Memorial Hospital Flagler, Inc., 15cv192 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Fort Payne Hospital Corporation, 14cv1477, doing business as Dekalb Regional Medical Center, Longmont United Hospital, 15-cv-01800, Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 15-cv-01800 and others
Defendant / Appellee: Alex Michael Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?