Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tina Neville, et al v. Charlotte Burrows
as 24-5103
Plaintiff:
Tina Neville, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated and Rachel E. Bennet, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated
Defendant:
Charlotte A. Burrows, in Her Official Capacity as Chair of the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
USA v. Barry Ramey
as 23-3119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Barry Bennet Ramey
NEVILLE et al v. BURROWS
as 1:2022cv03246
Plaintiff:
TINA NEVILLE and Rachel E. Bennet
Defendant:
CHARLOTTE A. BURROWS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
William Hunt v. Alice Miller, et al
as 20-7034
Defendant / Appellee:
D. Michael Bennet, Dionna M. Lewis, Michael D. Gill and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William E. Hunt
American Lung Association, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1140
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator
Petitioner:
American Lung Association and American Public Health Association
Intervenor:
State of Kansas, Phil Bryant, Governor of the State of Mississippi, State of Texas and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
HUNT v. MILLER et al
as 1:2018cv02341
Defendant:
ALICE P. MILLER, DIONNA M. LEWIS, MICHAEL D. GILL and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. HUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANDREWS v. GREATER SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2012cv00430
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ANDREWS
Defendant:
GREATER SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, WMATA, WADE MCCLOUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. SALAZAR et al
as 1:2011cv01241
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
KEN SALAZAR , BOB ABBEY and STEVE BENNET
Intervenor_defendant:
NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
