Cases 1 - 10 of 18
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
NLRB v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 23-1002
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. NLRB
as 22-1310
Petitioner:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
NLRB v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 22-1309
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. NLRB
as 22-1275
Petitioner:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
GOSOLAR LLC v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 1:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
GOSOLAR and GOSOLAR LLC
Defendant:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
NLRB v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 17-1111
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. NLRB
as 17-1065
Petitioner:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Movant-Intervenor:
Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION v. AT&T, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01600
Plaintiff:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION
Defendant:
AT&T, INC. , AT&T MOBILITY LLC , T-MOBILE USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01560
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA , STATE OF OHIO and others
Defendant:
AT&T INC. , T-MOBILE USA, INC. and DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG
Movant:
GOOGLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
