Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al v. FWS, et al
as 23-5227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Center for Biological Diversity and Friends of Minnesota Scientific and Natural Areas
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and United States Department of the Interior
S. Young, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-5305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
S. Stanley Young, Dr. and Louis Anthony Cox, Jr., Dr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the EPA, Science Advisory Board and others
Amicus Curiae:
Atlantic Legal Foundation
YOUNG v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2021cv02623
Plaintiff:
DR. S. STANLEY YOUNG, S. STANLEY YOUNG and LOUIS ANTHONY COX, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, MICHAEL S. REGAN, SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. et al v. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv00770
Defendant:
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and MARTHA WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF MINNESOTA SCIENTIFIC AND NATURAL AREAS and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540
COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv01964
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ORGANISATION
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION et al v. TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED et al
as 1:2009mc00189
Petitioner:
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED, PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and ALLIANCENSE LIMITED
Respondent:
HTC CORPORATION and HTC AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
