Cases 21 - 30 of 73
ARPAIO v. ROBILLARD et al
as 1:2019cv03366
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MICHAEL ARPAIO
Defendant:
KEVIN ROBILLARD, HUFFINGTON POST, ROLLING STONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2019cv03004
Plaintiff:
CAROL DANKS, KEVIN A CLAFTON, COLT BOWIE CAUMUNE and others
Defendant:
MOHAMMD JAVAD ZARIF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CANUTO v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2019cv01791
Plaintiff:
TERESITA A. CANUTO
Defendant:
HAKEEM JEFFRIES, NANCY PELOSI, LIS CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
LOVELACE v. MEDSTAR HEALTH INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01193
Defendant:
LAURA S. JOHNSON, MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER, INC., MEDSTAR MEDICAL GROUP II, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LISA LOVELACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOVELACE v. MEDSTAR HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01174
Defendant:
LAURA S. JOHNSON, MEDSTAR MEDICAL GROUP II, LLC, MEDSTAR HEALTH, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LISA LOVELACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOVELACE v. MEDSTAR HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01154
Defendant:
LAURA S. JOHNSON, MEDSTAR MEDICAL GROUP II, LLC, MEDSTAR HEALTH, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LISA LOVELACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHERMAN v. GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2019cv00452
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman
Defendant:
GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY, Kevin Coreas and Nathaniel Palacios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THORNTON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2019cv00238
Defendant:
DANEEKA TERESA TARRANCE, WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, KEVIN CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN THORNTON
ARPAIO v. ZUCKER et al
as 1:2018cv02894
Defendant:
ROLLING STONE, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., JEFF ZUCKER and others
Plaintiff:
JOE ARPAIO and JOSEPH MICHAEL ARPAIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MADISON et al v. HOWARD UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2018cv02352
Defendant:
Kevin Nickelberry, Howard Univeristy and HOWARD UNIVERSITY
Plaintiff:
KAI TEASE and AUSAR MADISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
