Cases 1 - 10 of 11
WEIERSTALL v. LONG FENCE AND HOME, LLLP
as 1:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
ERIC WEIERSTALL
Not Classified By Court:
Long Fence and Home, LLLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
ALEXANDER v. LONG
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
LIAM ALEXANDER
Defendant:
ANN LONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
GRAY v. BAUM et al
as 1:2022cv01858
Plaintiff:
LINWOOD GRAY
Defendant:
PHILLIS BAUM, HEATHER LONG and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
GRAY v. LONG et al
as 1:2021cv02672
Plaintiff:
LINWOOD GRAY
Defendant:
HEATHER B. LONG, JANE DOE and KEVIN E. BEHRNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DANA JOHNSON v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00821
Defendant:
CRAIG CHERVERT LONG, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER, LLC
Plaintiff:
DANA JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rose Duru v. United States Government, et al
as 20-5109
Defendant / Appellee:
Arthur M. Southam, M.D., Nathalia Cimbolti, Outreach Specialist, Bernard J. Tyson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rose Adanma Duru
LEFKOWITZ et al v. LONG FENCE COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv01016
Defendant:
LONG FENCE COMPANY INC. and CONSIGLI CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.,
Plaintiff:
LEONARD LEFKOWITZ and SARADONA LEFKOWITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CORTEZ v. WRIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv00626
Defendant:
MARYPAT WRIGHT, SANDY KENNEDY, MONUMENT SOTHEBY'S INTERNATIONAL and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00216
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
LISA ANN LONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LONG v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv02960
Plaintiff:
PAULA M. LONG
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
