Cases 1 - 8 of 8
XIONG et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2020cv01346
Defendant:
CHASE BANK, CITIBANK, WELLS FARGO BANK and others
Plaintiff:
SHOUA MOUA, BRANDY XIONG, JOHN TOU XIONG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
ESTATE OF D.C. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00743
Defendant:
DOES 1-40, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, SUNTRUST BANK and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF D.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2401
YELLEN et al v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2016cv02467
Plaintiff:
MIKE YELLEN, JOSE R. SERVIDA, JAMES FRANCO and others
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., PENNYMAC CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS et al v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON et al
as 1:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
CELIA M. WILLIAMS and MARIAN A. LASHER
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ALBERTELLI LAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ALKASABI et al v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A. et al
as 1:2012cv02021
Plaintiff:
OSAMA A. ALKASABI and NADIA HADDADA
Defendant:
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A., WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
SHEEHAN v. CHASE BANK USA N.A.
as 1:2012cv01940
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SHEEHAN
Defendant:
CHASE BANK USA N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1666 Consumer Credit Protection-billing errors
HOPPMAN et al v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv01252
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. HOPPMAN and WENDY GILLETTE HOPPMAN
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, SHAPIRO AND BURSON, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
IHEBEREME v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A, et al
as 1:2010cv01106
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER IHEBEREME
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE, N.A. , CHEVY CHASE BANK, F.S.B. and KATE STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
