Cases 151 - 160 of 12,463
VALENTINE v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
THOMAS VALENTINE
Defendant:
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, GEORGE WASHINGTON MEDICAL FACULTY ASSOCIATES and UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JEAN-BAPTISTE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2024cv01040
Plaintiff:
HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PARKER v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY PARKER
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, ROBERT CONTEE, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gerald Da'vage v. District of Columbia Housing Authority, et al
as 24-7043
Plaintiff:
Gerald D. Da'Vage
Defendant:
District of Columbia Housing Authority, Ronald McCoy, Paulette Campbell and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
WORTHAM v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
KRISTAL WORTHAM
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
